Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tung-Lin Wu vs Dane Sweeny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wu vs Sweeny analysis and find out who is favored!
Tung-Lin Wu vs Dane Sweeny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wu has won 53.5% of points on his second serve, while Sweeny has won 51.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wu, in recent form, has won 50.07% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sweeny has won 49.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.21% and 33.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wu has saved 53.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sweeny has saved 56.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wu has won 48.21% of matches played (W/L 27/ 29), with Sweeny winning 49.18% (W/L 30/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 170/ 129), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Sweeny has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 135/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Wu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 22/ 20), where as Sweeny has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 22/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Wu winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Wu winning 4 and Sweeny winning 1. The last match between Wu and Sweeny was at the Gwangju Challenger, 15-04-2024, First, Hard with Tung-Lin Wu getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wu and Sweeny have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wu winning 1 times and Sweeny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wu winning 1, and Sweeny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wu has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.18 while Sweeny has played against players with an average rank of 343.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wu has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sweeny has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wu has converted 37.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sweeny has converted 42.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wu 2 - 0 Sweeny
284
Rank
158
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
224
Rank
194
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
54% (227-191)
Career Total W/L
57% (161-121)
46% (11-13)
YTD W/L
54% (14-12)
$106,780
Career Prize Money
$274,065
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Dane Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:43 | 2:6:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (123/163) | 60% (100/168) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (84/123) | 68% (68/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (23/40) | 46% (31/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (7/20) | 20% (3/15) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (69/168) | 34% (56/163) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Dane Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (11/13) | 54% (14/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (25/30) | 52% (34/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (267/276) | 50% (301/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) | 56% (14/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 74 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:27 | 1:49:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 278.08 | 314.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1135/1712) | 63% (1235/1951) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (750/1135) | 65% (807/1235) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (305/577) | 52% (369/716) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (63/166) | 43% (77/181) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (633/1685) | 39% (757/1923) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (8/10) | 52% (11/10) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (11/23) | 54% (13/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 38% (13/5) |
Tung-Lin Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Moez Echargui
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
120)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Dane Sweeny
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Dane Sweeny
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Dane Sweeny
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yanki Erel
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
45 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Wu Vs Sweeny Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
